DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR SELECTION OF PESTICIDES FOR CHILI PLANTS USING THE MABAC METHOD

Sukamto Sukamto; Aidil Fitriansyah; Randi Andri  Nugrah

doi:10.52436/1.jutif.2023.4.5.977

Sukamto Information Systems, FMIPA, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indoensia
Aidil Fitriansyah Information Systems, FMIPA, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indoensia
Randi Andri Nugrah Information Systems, FMIPA, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indoensia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2023.4.5.977

Keywords: chili plant, MABAC method, pesticides

Abstract

The use of pesticides in agriculture plays a role in preventing and reducing diseases in chili plants. Pesticides for chili plants are quite widely spread on the market and have the advantages of each product offered to farmers, so farmers must be more careful and understanding in choosing pesticides to be used in preventing chili plant diseases. For that we need a decision support system (SPK). The data used in this research are 10 types of pesticides as an alternative. While the criteria are determined based on the agriculture and food service, namely price, classification, number of diseases eradicated, method of action, shelf life, and formulation concentration. Data analysis uses the MABAC method to support decision making for farmers in providing an assessment of the best pesticides on chili plants by steps to forming decision matrices, normalizing decision matrices, determining weighted matrices, determining border area matrices, determining alternative distance matrices, and ranking. The research results obtained the three best pesticides are Tridex 80 WP, Ziflo 76 WG, and Cabriotop 60 WG.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Monica and W. T. Atmojo, “Decision Support System Selecting Cryptocurrency Exchange Using AHP Method,” JUTIF (Jurnal Tek. Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 345–354, 2023.

I. D. Permana and A. Syaripudin, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Menentukan Guru Terbaik di SMK Wiraniaga dengan Metode Multi-Attributive Border Approximation (MABAC) Berbasis WEB,” J. Ilmu Komput. dan Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2023.

R. Purwowicaksono, F. Akbar, and M. R. Fahlevi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Alat Kontrasepsi di BKKBN Kabupaten Cirebon Berbasis WEB Menggunakan Metode MABAC,” JKBTI (Jurnal Kecerdasan Buatan dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2023.

D. W. Sipahutar and Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Teknisi Broadcasting Pada TVRI Medan Menerapkan Metode MABAC,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 55–63, 2021, doi: 10.30865/jurikom.v8i2.2829.

I. E. Ismail and A. D. Hasanah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Pinjaman Menggunakan Metode Multiattribute Approximation Border Area Comparison (MABAC),” JTT (Jurnal Teknol. Ter., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 70–81, 2022.

Zulkarnain and Y. Hasan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Peserta FLS2N SMAN 1 Perbaungan Menggunakan Metode MABAC,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2021.

R. Kristianto Hondro, “MABAC: Pemilihan Penerima Bantuan Rastra Menggunakan Metode MultiAttributive Border Approximation Area Comparison,” J. Mahajana Inf., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 41–52, 2018.

E. P. Rachmawati, S. R. Cholil, and S. Asmiatun, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Reward dan Punishment Perusahaan Makanan Menggunakan Metode MABAC,” J. Rekayasa Sist. dan Ind., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 79–87, 2022.

Sukamto, Y. Andriyani, and I. D. Id, “Aplikasi Metode VIKOR untuk Menentukan Penerimaan Proposal Kegiatan Desa,” Komput. Terap., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 336–345, 2022.

E. S. Rubiyanto, F. Akbar, and M. R. Fahlevvi, “Application of Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) Method for the Selection of Building Material Suppliers on Mahakarya Sukri Perkasa (MSP) Ciribon,” JUTIF (Jurnal Tek. Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 355–364, 2023.

Sukamto, I. D. Id, and A. D. Jukris, “Penerapan Metode TOPSIS untuk Menentukan Kelayakan Perpustakaan Sekolah Diakreditasi,” SISFOKOM (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2023.

A. P. Simaremare, “Penerapan Metode MABAC Pada Penerimaan Ahli Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3),” Resolusi Rekayasa Tek. Inform. dan …, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 209–220, 2021.

M. D. Saefudin and A. Mirza, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Penilaian Guru Terbaik Dengan Metode Multi-Attributive Border Approximation (MABAC),” J. Ilmu Komput. dan Sci., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 609–619, 2022.

E. B. Barus, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Best Employee Dengan Menerapkan Metode MABAC,” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 551–557, 2022, doi: 10.47065/tin.v2i9.1028.

R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode MABAC dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekomendasi Aplikasi Pemesanan Hotel Terbaik,” JOSH (Journal Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 191–201, 2022, doi: 10.47065/josh.v4i1.2415.

T. S. Alasi and Murdani, “Recommendations for Placement of Internships in Industry with the Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) Method Based on Student Scores,” Infokum, vol. 10, no. 02, pp. 961–965, 2022.

W. Yusnaeni and M. Marlina, “MABAC Method Dalam Penentuan Kelayakan Penerima Bantuan SPP,” EVOLUSI J. Sains dan Manaj., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 46–55, 2020, doi: 10.31294/evolusi.v8i1.7536.

S. R. Purba, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Dokter Terbaik di Dinas Kesehatan Kab. Simalungun Menggunakan Metode MABAC,” Pelita Inform. Inf. dan Inform., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 129–135, 2020.

N. Ndruru, Mesran, F. T. Waruru, and D. P. Utomo, “Penerapan Metode MABAC untuk Mendukung Pengambilan Keputusan Pemilihan Kepala Cabang Pada PT. Cefa Indonesia Sejahtera Lestari,” Resolusi Rekayasa Tek. Inform. dan Inf., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 36–49, 2020.

F. Laila and N. A. Hasibuan, “Pemilihan Pengangkatan Karyawan Tetap Menerapkan Metode Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison,” J. Informatics Manag. Inf. Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–12, 2021.

M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode MABAC pada Penentuan Coffee Shop Terbaik,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 338–347, 2023, doi: 10.30865/jurikom.v10i1.5820.