MEASUREMENT OF INFORMATION SECURITY AND PRIVACY AWARENESS USING THE MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS (MCDA) METHOD

I Gede Agus  Sukariana Yasa; I Made Edy  Listartha; I Made Ardwi  Pradnyana

doi:10.52436/1.jutif.2023.4.4.692

I Gede Agus Sukariana Yasa Informatics Engineering, Engineering and Vocational Faculty, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia
I Made Edy Listartha Informatics Engineering, Engineering and Vocational Faculty, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia
I Made Ardwi Pradnyana Informatics Engineering, Engineering and Vocational Faculty, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2023.4.4.692

Keywords: Information security, privacy, MCDA, AHP

Abstract

Information security is an asset that has value so it must be protected, along with increasing assets it is undeniable that many people wish to gain access and control it so that behind the convenience in the digital world there are many risks to information assets. There are several cases that occur related to information security such as data theft, illegal access, information leakage and vandalism where this becomes the privacy of the user. So it is necessary to do research from the user's perspective to measure the level of information security and privacy awareness of students and lecturers as well as recommendations that will be suggested based on the results of measuring information security and privacy awareness. The objects in this research are students and lecturers at the XYZ University. The method used is Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) by measuring the dimensions of knowledge, attitude, behavior in six areas of information security and three areas of privacy. Data were obtained by distributing questionnaires using a Likert scale of 5. Based on the questionnaire from the respondents, it can be seen students and lecturers have awareness that is at a "good" level of 85% in information security while privacy is at a "good" level with a result of 89% but in the behavior dimension there are several areas that are included in the "average" level including the area passwords by 62%, mobile equipment area by 77% incident area by 70% and on privacy security on the behavior dimension there is one area namely the login activity area by 78% so this needs to be given recommendations for improvement in order to reach a "good" level by providing socialization/ training for students and lecturers

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

F. H. Purwanto and M. Huda, “Pengukuran Tingkat Keamanan Informasi Perguruan Tinggi XYZ Menggunakan Indeks Keamanan Informasi (KAMI) Berbasis ISO,” J. VOI, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 31–40, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://voi.stmik-tasikmalaya.ac.id/index.php/voi/article/view/162

J. R. Batmetan, “Tingkat Kesadaran Privasi Atas Masalah Keamanan Informasi (Lack Of Security Awareness),” 2018, doi: 10.31219/osf.io/cahzr.

BSSN, “Press release launching laporan tahunan hasil monitoring keamanan siber tahun 2021,” https://bssn.go.id/LapTahMonitoring, 2022.

M. Amin, “Pengukuran Tingkat Kesadaran Keamanan Informasi Menggunakan Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (Mcda),” J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Komun. dan Inform., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2014.

R. Akraman, C. Candiwan, and Y. Priyadi, “Pengukuran Kesadaran Keamanan Informasi Dan Privasi Pada Pengguna Smartphone Android Di Indonesia,” J. Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 115, 2018, doi: 10.21456/vol8iss2pp115-122.

et al Dafid, “Metode MCDA Untuk Pengukuran Tingkat Kesadaran Keamanan Informasi Pada Mahasiswa,” JATISI (Jurnal Tek. Inform. dan Sist. Informasi), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 11–20, 2020, doi: 10.35957/jatisi.v7i1.296.

H. Gunawan, “Pengukuran Kesadaran Keamanan Informasi Dan Privasi Dalam Sosial Media,” J. Muara Sains, Teknol. Kedokt. dan Ilmu Kesehat., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, 2021, doi: 10.24912/jmstkik.v5i1.3456.

A. Kusumaningrum, H. Wijayanto, and B. D. Raharja, “Pengukuran Tingkat Kesadaran Keamanan Siber di Kalangan Mahasiswa saat Study From Home dengan Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA),” J. Ilm. SINUS, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 69, 2022, doi: 10.30646/sinus.v20i1.586.

S. Destya, “Pengukuran Tingkat Kesadaran Keamanan Informasi Berdasarkan Behavior Dan Offence Scale,” CESS (Journal Comput. Eng. Syst. Sci., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 236, 2020, doi: 10.24114/cess.v5i2.18206.

H. A. Kruger and W. D. Kearney, “A prototype for assessing information security awareness,” Comput. Secur., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 289–296, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2006.02.008.

M. R. Ramadhani and A. R. Pratama, “Analisis Kesadaran Cybersecurity Pada Pengguna Media Sosial Di Indonesia,” Journal.Uii.Ac.Id, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2020.

T. Torres, “Library Binus_ Skala Likert,” http://library.binus.ac.id/eColls/eThesisdoc/Bab2/RS1_2017_2_1040_Bab2.pdf, 2017.

Patricia Kalis Jati Sekar Agri, “Evaluasi Tingkat Kesadaran Keamanan Informasi Mahasiswa Akuntansi Universitas Sanata Dharma,” Universitas Sanata Dharma, 2019.

E. P. Widoyoko, Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. PUSTAKA PELAJAR, 2015.

F. Yusup, “UJI VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS INSTRUMEN PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF,” J. Tarb. J. Ilm. Kependidikan, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2018, doi: 10.21831/jorpres.v13i1.12884.

P. D. Sugiyono, “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D (Cetakan Ke 26),” Bandung CV Alf., pp. 1–334, 2019.

R. Yount, “Populations and Sampling Frames,” Eur. Univ. Inst., pp. 1–11, 2006, [Online]. Available: http://www.vrdc.cornell.edu/info7470/2005/Lecture Notes/lecture4a-populations-and-sampling-frames.pdf

G. K. Dewi, “Analisis Keamanan Sistem Informasi Universitas X,” Account. Bus. Inf. Syst. J., 2021, [Online]. Available: https://journal.ugm.ac.id/abis/article/view/64235

M. Amin, “Information Security Awareness Level Measurement Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (Mcda),” J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Komun. dan Inform., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 122371, 2014.