COMPARISON OF ALGORITHM BETWEEN CLASSIFICATION & REGRESSION TREES AND SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE IN DETERMINING STUDENT ACCEPTANCE IN STATE UNIVERSITIES

M. Anwar Sadat; Pujiono Pujiono; Anggun  Pambudi; Sholihul  Ibad

doi:10.52436/1.jutif.2023.4.6.1565

M. Anwar Sadat Master's Program in Informatics Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Semarang, Indonesia
Pujiono Master's Program in Informatics Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Semarang, Indonesia
Anggun Pambudi Master's Program in Informatics Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro Semarang, Indonesia
Sholihul Ibad Information Systems Study Program, Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Tuban, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2023.4.6.1565

Keywords: Cart Algorithm, PTN participants, SVM algorithm

Abstract

Higher education entrance selection activities are intended to obtain superior student candidates. The opportunity to take part in the selection is given to all high school graduate students and equivalent. The student entrance test at PTN consists of three types of selection routes, namely the SNMPTN or invitation route, the SBMPTN, and the independent examination held by state universities. Starting from the dataset, data selection was carried out from 143 students' data and 7 attribute selections were carried out using preprocessing using data transformation first. The aim of using data transformation is to simplify the data training process for MAN 1 students in Cirebon. Preprocessing for prediction of classification results, accuracy of testing data for 143 students is implemented in the program and the resulting calculation process will be more efficient. After going through the preprocessing stage, the data is divided into training data and testing data using 10-fold cross validation. Next, for the classification process, a comparison of two methods will be used, namely for the first method using CART, the second method using SVM by adding Gain ratio weighting. The results of the research show that in the first experiment the researcher carried out a comparative trial of cross validation and classification performance and used the CART and SVM algorithms. The results comparison using the CART algorithm gets an accuracy of 86.10% and the SVM algorithm method for classifying students entering PTN was 86.71%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

O. Arifudin, “Manajemen Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal (Spmi) sebagai upaya meningkatkan mutu perguruan tinggi,” J. Ilm. MEA Manajemen, Ekon. Akunt., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 161–169, 2019.

A. Karim, N. F. Mardhotillah, and M. I. Samadi, “Ethical leadership transforms into ethnic: Exploring new leader’s style of Indonesia,” J. Leadersh. Organ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 146–157, 2019.

S. Abbas, Manajemen Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta, Indonesia: Prenada Media Group, 2008.

J. Mantik, R. Zaeni, A. Syam, and W. Achmad, “Online Learning in Higher Education: Analysis during the Pandemic Covid-19,” J. Mantik, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2256–2261, 2022.

A. S. Maadi, “Digitalisasi manajemen pendidikan Islam dan ekonomi syariah di Perguruan Tinggi,” Fikrotuna J. Pendidik. dan Manaj. Islam, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 741–759, 2018.

M. N. Husunun, Menuju Kepustakawanan Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah Aisyiyah berkemajuan. Surakarta: UMS Library, 2017.

S. R. Ratnawati and W. Werdiningsih, “Pemanfaatan e-learning sebagai inovasi media pembelajaran PAI di era revolusi industri 4.0,” Belajea J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 199–220, 2020, doi: 10.29240/belajea.v5i2.1429.

W. Cayeni and A. S. Utari, “Penggunaan Teknologi Dalam Pendidikan: Tantangan Guru Pada Era Revolusi Industri 4 . 0,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang 03 Mei 2019, 2019, pp. 658–667. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/index.php/Prosidingpps/article/view/3096

I. M. W. Jagantara, P. B. Adnyana, and N. L. P. M. Widiyanti, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis proyek (PjBP) terhadap hasil belajar Biologi ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa SMA,” e-Journal Progr. Pascasarj. Univ. Pendidik. Ganesha, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2014.

K. A. Winata, Sahudi, Nurwadjah, and A. Suhartini, “Implementasi konsepsi tujuan pembelajaran PAI untuk menghadapi era revolusi 4.0,” EduTeach J. Edukasi dan Teknol. Pembelajaran, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 11–21, 2020, doi: 10.37859/eduteach.v1i2.1964.

N. I. Prabawati, Widodo, and M. Ficky, “Duskarnaen. Kinerja Algoritma Classification and Regression Tree (Cart) dalam Mengklasifikasikan Lama Masa Studi Mahasiswa yang Mengikuti Organisasi di Universitas Negeri Jakarta,” J. Pinter, vol. 3, no. 2, 2019.

L. D. B. Pratiwi, W. Wibowo, and I. Zain, “Klasifikasi Nilai Peminat SBMPTN (Seleksi Bersama Masuk Perguruan Tinggi Negeri) ITS dengan Pendekatan Classification and Regression Trees (CART),” J. Sains Dan Seni Pomits, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 15, 2020.

K. W. Lamm, H. S. Carter, and A. J. Lamm, “A theory based model of interpersonal leadership: An integration of the literature,” J. Leadersh. Educ., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 183–205, 2016, [Online]. Available: doi:

Wulandari, R. Rosnelly, and Wanayumini, “Analisis Metode Decision Tree Dalam Memprediksi Kelulusan Mahasiswa132,” CSRID J., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 130–140, 2021, doi: https://www.doi.org/10.22303/csrid.13.3.2021.130-140 e-ISSN :2460-870X.

G. W. N. Wibowo, Z. Arifin, M. Anwarudin, and N. I. Romli, “Prediksi Kelanjutan Studi Siswa Ke Perguruan Tinggi Dengan Naive Bayes,” J. DISPROTEK, vol. 11, no. 1, 2020.

M. R. Qisthiano, “Klasifikasi Terhadap Prediksi Kelulusan Mahasiswa Dengan Menggunakan Metode Support Vector Machine (SVM),” in 2 st Proceeding STEKOM, Jakarta, Indonesia: Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Nasional (ITBN), 2022.

J. W. Cresswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2014.

G. Guthrie, Auerbach Qualitative Data. 2014. doi: 10.4135/9788132105961.n15.

Sugiyono, Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2010.

T. Perumal, “Quantitative Research Methods,” Course Mater., vol. Chapter 8, no. Leedy 1993, pp. 87–104, 2014, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v8i1.1023.

A. Çelik et al., “Science Integration,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.001.

J. Afriana, A. Permanasari, and A. Fitriani, “Penerapan project based learning terintegrasi STEM untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa ditinjau dari gender,” J. Inov. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 202, 2016, doi: 10.21831/jipi.v2i2.8561.

E. Ersanilli, J. Carling, and H. De Haas, “Methodology for quantitative data collection.” Eumagine, Emagining Europe from the Outside, pp. 1–27, 2011.

Jubilee, SPSS Komplet untuk Mahasiswa. Jakarta, Indonesia: Elex Media Komputindo, 2018.

G. Galih, “Data Mining di Bidang Pendidikan untuk Analisa Prediksi Kinerja Mahasiswa dengan Komparasi 2 Model Prediksi pada STMIK Jabar,” J. Teknol. Sist. Inf. dan Apl., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 23, 2019, doi: 10.32493/jtsi.v2i1.2643.

M. F. D. Ikhbal and D. Kurniadi, “Menentukan Penjurusan Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Metode Decision Tree Algoritma C4.5 (Studi Kasus: SMA Negeri 2 Padang),” J. VOKASI Inform., doi: https://doi.org/10.24036/javit.v1i3.40 ISSN: 2775 - 6807.

A. Karim, “Pembaharuan pendidikan Islam multikulturalis,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam -Ta’lim, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 19–35, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.upi.edu/taklim/view/3880/pembaharuan-pendidikan-islam-multikulturalis-.html

S. L. Qodriah, W. Hartati, and A. Karim, “Self-leadership and career success: Motivation of college lecturers,” J. Leadersh. Organ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 79–95, 2019.

Fikriyah, A. Karim, M. K. Huda, and A. Sumiati, “Spiritual leadership: The case of instilling values in students through the Kiai’s program in the globalization era,” J. Leadersh. Organ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 16–30, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/jlo.63922.

A. Karim and D. Afnan, “Kiai interpersonal managerial: Henry Minztberg perspective,” J. Leadersh. Organ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 75–90, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/jlo.56290.

S. Bahri, “Implementasi Data Mining Untuk Menentukan Minat Siswa Dalam Menentukan Jurusan Pada Perguruan Tinggi,” ITB Ahmad Dahlan, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–33, 2022.

D. Afnan et al., “Phubbing and social interaction: An analysis of smartphone usage in higher education,” J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 2325–2334, 2020, doi: 10.5373/JARDCS/V12I6/S20201191.

A. Karim and F. Wajdi, “Propaganda and da’wah in digital era (A case of hoax cyber-bullying against ulama),” KARSA J. Sos. dan Budaya Keislam., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 171–202, 2019, doi: 10.19105/karsa.v27i1.1921.

E. Priyanto, “Dakwah dan kesalehan sosial: kiprah dakwah Roostien Ilyas,” Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2015.

D. Widiantari, M. I. Bin Samadi, and A. Karim, “Charismatic Leadership Effects of Teachers in Fostering Graduate Quality of Senior High School,” J. Leadersh. Organ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 179–190, 2022, doi: 10.22146/jlo.74872.

N. Anwar and I. Riadi, “Analisis Investigasi Forensik WhatsApp Messanger Smartphone Terhadap WhatsApp Berbasis Web,” J. Ilm. Tek. Elektro Komput. dan Inform., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 1, 2017, doi: 10.26555/jiteki.v3i1.6643.

M. R. Syabibi, A. Karim, S. Kulkarni, and A. Sahil, “Communicative cultural dakwah of Abdurrahman Wahid in pluralistic society,” Karsa J. Soc. Islam. Cult., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 1–33, 2021, doi: 10.19105/karsa.v29i2.5220.

A. Karim, A. Faiz, N. Nur’Aini, and F. Y. Rahman, “The policy of organization, the spirit of progressivism Islam, and its association with social welfare educators,” Tatar Pas. J. Diklat Keagamaan, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 69–75, 2022.

F. Mansir and A. Karim, “Islamic education learning approaches in shaping students’ emotional intelligence in the digital age,” HAYULA Indones. J. Multidiscip. Islam. Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 67–86, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/004.01.04.