DISASTER RESPONSE MODELING BASE ON LANDSLIDE EARLY WARNING USING CASE MANAGEMENT MODEL AND NOTATION

Sarah Ayu Ekamas; Hanson Prihantoro  Putro; Teduh  Dirgahayu

doi:10.20884/1.jutif.2022.3.5.528

Sarah Ayu Ekamas Jurusan Informatika, Fakultas Teknologi Industri, Universitas Islam Indonesia
Hanson Prihantoro Putro Jurusan Informatika, Fakultas Teknologi Industri, Universitas Islam Indonesia
Teduh Dirgahayu Jurusan Informatika, Fakultas Teknologi Industri, Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jutif.2022.3.5.528

Keywords: Case Management Model and Notation, Early Warning System, Information System Model, Landslide Disaster response

Abstract

There are a few handling steps in the emergency response to landslides that need thorough explanation. The flexibility of emergency response situations is ineffectively supported by traditional modeling methodologies because they are excessively inflexible. Companies have traditionally modeled their business processes using the Business Process Management Approach and Notation (BPMN) model. For design case management, such as the emergency reaction to a landslide disaster, BPMN modeling is unsuitable. because the BPMN modeling focuses how business processes flow inside a company. The Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN), the newest modeling approach from the Object Management Group (OMG), was launched in 2013 with the purpose of completing the BPMN modeling approach. The unstructured and adaptable CMMN claims to be able to handle urgent situations. This study's intention is to develop a CMMN model of a landslide emergency reaction scenario based on an emergency alert from an Early Warning System (EWS) sensor. In order to acquire the qualitative data for this study, the researcher first conducted a literature review. Then used the interview and observation methods to gather data, and from this data, we created the model using the CMMN modeling approach. The Yogyakarta Special Region Disaster Management Agency's (BPBD DIY) data flow of a disaster management information system, which was already operational, was analyzed by researchers. Then, the researchers used CMMN to model the data in order to find out opportunities to improve the disaster management information system already in use at BPBD DIY. Two CMMN models—the BPBD DIY disaster management information system model and the recommendation model for system improvements—were created in this study. The analysis of the current disaster management information system model resulted in the recomendation of this model. A prototype of feature recommendation is created as part of this research and given to specialists in natural disasters for model validation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Grace, “UU no 24 th 2007,” Undang-undang, vol. вы12у, no. 235, p. 245, 2007.

N. D. R. Sugianti, I. B. K. Widiartha, and A. Y. Husodo, “Prototype Early Warning System Tanah Longsor Menggunakan Fuzzy Logic Berbasis Google Maps,” J-Cosine, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 154–161, 2019.

O. O. Artha, B. Rahmadya, and R. E. Putri, “Sistem Peringatan Dini Bencana Longsor Menggunakan Sensor Accelerometer dan Sensor Kelembabapan Tanah Berbasis Android,” J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Eng., vol. 2, no. 02, pp. 64–70, 2018, doi: 10.25077/jitce.2.02.64-70.2018.

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana, “Buku Saku Tanggap Tangkas Tangguh Menghadapi Bencana,” Badan Nas. Penanggulangan Bencana, p. 62, 2017.

A. Y. Shahrah and M. A. Al-Mashari, “Modelling emergency response process using case management model and notation,” IET Softw., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 301–308, 2017, doi: 10.1049/iet-sen.2016.0209.

M. P. R. Herrera and J. S. Díaz, “Improving emergency response through business process, case management, and decision models,” Proc. Int. ISCRAM Conf., vol. 2019-May, no. May, pp. 116–125, 2019.

S. Sielskaite and D. Kalibatiene, “On CMMN Model for Software System Project Simulation,” 2021 IEEE Open Conf. Electr. Electron. Inf. Sci. eStream 2021 - Proc., 2021, doi: 10.1109/eStream53087.2021.9431516.

“Case Management Model and NotationTM (CMMNTM) | Object Management Group.” [Online]. Available: https://www.omg.org/cmmn/. [Accessed: 15-Jul-2022].

A. Y. and M. A., “Adaptive Case Management Framework to Develop Case-based Emergency Response System,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 57–66, 2017, doi: 10.14569/ijacsa.2017.080408.

A. Suchenia, K. Kluza, P. Wiśniewski, K. Jobczyk, and A. Ligęza, “Towards knowledge interoperability between the UML, DMN, BPMN and CMMN models,” MATEC Web Conf., vol. 252, p. 02011, 2019, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201925202011.

M. Wiemuth, D. Junger, M. A. Leitritz, J. Neumann, T. Neumuth, and O. Burgert, “Application fields for the new Object Management Group (OMG) Standards Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN) and Decision Management Notation (DMN) in the perioperative field,” Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg., vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1439–1449, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11548-017-1608-3.

M. Kocbek Bule, G. Polančič, J. Huber, and G. Jošt, “Semiotic clarity of Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN),” Comput. Stand. Interfaces, vol. 66, no. July 2018, p. 103354, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.csi.2019.04.013.

A. Suchenia Mroczek, K. Kluza, K. Jobczyk, P. Wiśniewski, M. Wypych, and A. Ligęza, “Supporting BPMN process models with UML sequence diagrams for representing time issues and testing models,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 10246 LNAI, pp. 589–598, 2017, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-59060-8_53.

“Business Process Model & NotationTM (BPMNTM) | Object Management Group.” [Online]. Available: https://www.omg.org/bpmn/. [Accessed: 15-Jul-2022].

I. Routis, M. Nikolaidou, and D. Anagnostopoulos, Modeling collaborative processes with CMMN: Success or failure? An experience report, vol. 318. Springer International Publishing, 2018.

I. Routis, M. Nikolaidou, and D. Anagnostopoulos, “Empirical evaluation of CMMN models: a collaborative process case study,” Softw. Syst. Model., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1395–1413, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10270-020-00802-9.

K. Kluza, P. Wiśniewski, A. Ligęza, A. Suchenia, and J. Wyrobek, “Knowledge representation in model driven approach in terms of the zachman framework,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 10842 LNAI, pp. 689–699, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91262-2_60.

I. Routis, M. Nikolaidou, and D. Anagnostopoulos, “Using CMMN to model social processes,” Lect. Notes Bus. Inf. Process., vol. 308, pp. 335–347, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_25.

W. Darmalaksana, “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka dan Studi Lapangan,” Pre-print Digit. Libr. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, pp. 1–6, 2020.

R. Hidayat, S. J. Sutanto, A. Hidayah, B. Ridwan, and A. Mulyana, “Development of a landslide early warning system in Indonesia,” Geosci., vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1–17, 2019, doi: 10.3390/geosciences9100451.

“Sop ews diy 2018,” 2018.

A. Zensen and J. Kuster, “A comparison of flexible BPMN and CMMN in practice: A case study on component release processes,” Proc. - 2018 IEEE 22nd Int. Enterp. Distrib. Object Comput. Conf. EDOC 2018, pp. 105–114, 2018, doi: 10.1109/EDOC.2018.00023.

B. A. B. I. Pendahuluan and E. Dims, “USER GUIDE Version 1.1 Oktober 2018,” 2018.

“DIMS DIY.” [Online]. Available: http://103.40.121.179/dims/. [Accessed: 23-Jun-2022].