SEMAR v1.0: An AI-driven Conceptual Model and Architecture for Smart Government in Indonesia Using a Mixed-Methods Approach

Authors

  • Assaf Arief Informatics, Universitas Khairun, Indonesia
  • Miftah Muhammad Electrical, Universitas Khairun, Indonesia
  • Achmad Fuad Informatics, Universitas Khairun, Indonesia
  • Dana Indra Sensuse Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2025.6.4.4996

Keywords:

AI-driven, A Conceptual Model, Architectures, Smart City, Smart Government

Abstract

Building smart cities represents a national priority for Indonesia to enhance global competitiveness, with artificial intelligence (AI) driven smart government as a key enabler. However, implementation faces significant challenges including unmeasured organizational maturity, lack of service innovation, fragmented governance, and minimal citizen engagement leading to government institutions' failure in achieving smart city vision. This study aims to develop a holistic conceptual model to identify critical success factors and evaluate processes that integrate public services, fostering AI-driven smart government innovation at strategic level. This research employs mixed-methods exploratory sequential design combining qualitative techniques (Systematic Literature Review, expert interviews) with quantitative validation (citizen survey, statistical analysis). The model was constructed using Factor Analysis, Thematic Analysis, TOGAF framework, and multidimensional view with validation through triangulation, expert judgment, Focus Group Discussions, and statistical analysis. Results show a comprehensive model consisting of 6 dimensions, 17 key components, and 5-layer organizational architecture with high reliability (Cronbach's Alpha 0.709-0.866) and expert consensus (86% agreement in Fuzzy Delphi Method analysis). This framework, referred to as SEMAR v1.0 (Smart Government Nusantara), serves as a benchmark for assessing the maturity and readiness of local government institutions in Indonesia. It offers the potential to improve SPBE scores through systematic evaluation, while also providing a theoretical foundation for smart government scholarship and a practical blueprint for policy implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, “Visi Indonesia 2045,” Orasi Ilmiah Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis - Universitas Indonesia, vol. 1, no. September, p. 48, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/BahanPaparanMPPN-VisiIndonesia2045-25September2017.pdf

BPS RI, Proyeksi Penduduk 2015 - 2045. Jakarta, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://indonesia.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Proyeksi Penduduk 2015-2045_.pdf

A. Shukla and A. Agnihotri, “AI-Driven Smart Management Processes: Transforming Decision-Making and Shaping the Future,” Library Progress International, vol. 44, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384392816

I. Koo, U. Zaman, H. Ha, and S. Nawaz, “Assessing the interplay of trust dynamics, personalization, ethical AI practices, and tourist behavior in the adoption of AI-driven smart tourism technologies,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 11, no. 1, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100455.

M. P. Rodriguez-Bolivar, C. Alcaide-Muñoz, and L. Alcaide-Muñoz, “Characterising smart initiatives’ planning in Smart Cities: an empirical analysis in Spanish Smart Cities,” Oct. 30, 2020, Association for Computing Machinery, Athens, Greece. doi: 10.1145/3428502.3428590.

I. Bastian, R. Effendi, E. A. Susanto, I. Unggara, and S. Sumiyana, “The government of Indonesia’s smart city development: Fiscal capacity, cognitive models in decision making, excessive caution about future accrual of benefits, and null regulatory leadership,” Front Built Environ, vol. 8, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2022.1065652.

D. Kociuba, M. Sagan, and W. Kociuba, “Toward the Smart City Ecosystem Model,” Energies (Basel), vol. 16, no. 6, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/en16062795.

R. Alsaigh, R. Mehmood, and I. Katib, “AI explainability and governance in smart energy systems: A review,” Jan. 27, 2023, Frontiers Media S.A. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1071291.

O. Hujran, M. M. Al-Debei, A. S. Al-Adwan, A. Alarabiat, and N. Altarawneh, “Examining the antecedents and outcomes of smart government usage: An integrated model,” Gov Inf Q, vol. 40, no. 1, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101783.

IESE Business School, “IESE Cities in Motion Index,” Spain, 2025. [Online]. Available: www.iese.edu

United Nation, “E-Government Survey 2024,” New York, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://publicadministration.un.org/en/

Kemenpan RB RI, SK MenpanRB RI No. 663 tentang Hasil Evaluasi SPBE 2024. 2025, pp. 1–29.

Ombusman RI, “Laporan Tahunan 2024,” Jakarta, 2025.

A. Arief and D. I. Sensuse, “Designing A Conceptual Model for Smart Government in Indonesia using Delphi 2 nd Round Validity,” in 2018 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), IEEE, 2018, pp. 93–98. doi: 10.1109/icacsis.2018.8618239.

A. Arief, D. I. Sensuse, and P. Mursanto, “Smart city’s trends, architectures, components, and challenges: A systematic review and building an initial model for indonesia,” 2022, Paulus Editora. doi: 10.14456/easr.2022.28.

L. Reis, C. Maier, and T. Weitzel, “Mixed-Methods in Information Systems Research: Status Quo, Core Concepts, and Future Research Implications,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 95–119, 2022, doi: 10.17705/1CAIS.05106.

J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.za/books?hl=en&lr=lang_en&id=EbogAQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=quantitative+creswell&ots=cahMpXRAF8&sig=jN66MOd3r5nCuoPAbLJry9QwdQQ#v=onepage&q=quantitative creswell&f=false

A. Carrera-Rivera, W. Ochoa, F. Larrinaga, and G. Lasa, “How-to conduct a systematic literature review: A quick guide for computer science research,” MethodsX, vol. 9, p. 101895, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101895.

D. I. Sensuse, A. Arief, and P. Mursanto, “An Empirical Validation of Foundation Models for Smart Government in Indonesia,” IJASEIT, 2021.

M. Naranjo-Zolotov et al., “Examining social capital and individual motivators to explain the adoption of online citizen participation,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 92, pp. 302–311, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2018.09.044.

L. G. Tornatzky, M. Fleischer, and A. K. Chakrabarti, Technological Innovation As a Process, no. January. Lexington Books, 1990. doi: 10.1142/9789811211461_0002.

M. Sounders, P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill, Research Methods for Business Students, vol. 7, no. September. 2016.

V. Venkatesh, S. A. Brown, and H. Bala, “Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems,” MIS Q, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 21–54, 2013, doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02.

The Open Group, The Open Group Standard - TOGAF Version 9.2. 2018.

Gil-Garcia, Pardo, and Nam, “Smarter as the New Urban Agenda,” in Public Administration and Information Technology, T. Nam, Ed., Springer, 2016, pp. 1–392. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8.

R. P. Dameri and C. Benevolo, “Governing Smart Cities: An Empirical Analysis,” Soc Sci Comput Rev, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 693–707, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0894439315611093.

M. Angelidou and A. Psaltoglou, “Social innovation, games and urban planning: an analysis of current approaches,” International Journal of Electronic Governance, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5–22, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1504/IJEG.2019.098807.

S. Zygiaris, “Smart City Reference Model: Assisting Planners to Conceptualize the Building of Smart City Innovation Ecosystems,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 217–231, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s13132-012-0089-4.

A. Caragliu, C. Del Bo, and P. Nijkamp, “Smart Cities in Europe,” Journal of Urban Technology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 65–82, 2011, doi: 10.1080/10630732.2011.601117.

F. Stephany, “It’s not only size that matters: determinants of Estonia’s e-governance success,” Electronic Government: An International Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 304–313, 2020, doi: 10.1504/EG.2020.108501.

Y.-M. Joo, T.-B. Tan, and M.-Y. Foo, “The Smart Nation: unpacking Singapore’s latest mega-digitalisation push,” in Smart cities in asia: governing development in the era of hyper-connectivity, T.-B. Tan and Y.-M. Joo, Eds., in Cities series. , Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020, pp. 19–37. [Online]. Available: https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/smart-cities-in-asia-9781788972871.html

Additional Files

Published

2025-09-13

How to Cite

[1]
A. Arief, M. . Muhammad, A. . Fuad, and D. I. . Sensuse, “SEMAR v1.0: An AI-driven Conceptual Model and Architecture for Smart Government in Indonesia Using a Mixed-Methods Approach”, J. Tek. Inform. (JUTIF), vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 2878–2889, Sep. 2025.