DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING CUSTOMER FEASIBILITY TO GRANT CREDIT ON SAVING AND LOAN COOPERATIVES USING COMPARISONS OF TOPSIS AND SAW METHOD
Abstract
Cooperative is one of the institutions engaged in the financial sector with the business of providing savings and loan funds to its members to improve the welfare of the community's economy however currently there are still many errors that occur in the calculation process and it takes a very long time, so we need a system that can simplify the selection process in determining a decision. This research aims to support a decision support system for determining the eligibility of customers by comparing the two, so that it can be determined which method is more relevant to be implemented in the case of customers selection in grant credit. In its application, this research uses a comparison of two methods, namely the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) methods. At the system design stage, the design model and system development flow are used as an illustration in the operation of the decision support system that has been carried out based on system analysis. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that the comparison of TOPSIS and SAW methods has inequality in the final results that can be seen from the ranking process. The test results show that the SAW method produces a value of 0.82% for customers named lintang with the highest, while TOPSIS with a value of 0.65% for highest value, so that the SAW method is more recommended in providing solutions to the decision support system.
Downloads
References
H. Nurdiyanto and S. Y. Minarto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Kredit Pada Koperasi Serba Usaha Berkah Tiram Jaya Menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (Ahp)”.
I. Hasan, “Penerapan Metode Technique For Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution (Topsis) Dalam Penentuan Pengambilan Keputusan Pemberian Kredit Pada Kjks Bmt Fastabiq Kota Kudus,” 2017.
T. Ayu, I. Sari, and N. Manurung, “The Best Harvesters Assessment System At Pt. Padasa Enam Utama By Simple Addictive Weighting (Saw) Method,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 237–243, 2022.
S. Rosad, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Pinjaman Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) (Studi Kasus: Koperasi Serba Usaha Ikatan Pedagang Mie Bakso Nusantara Wonogiri),” 2019.
A. Sellyana, “Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Penerima Kartu Identitas Miskin ( Kim ) Berbasis Web,” J. Mahajana Inf., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2020.
M. Mentari and R. Wahyu, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Guru Berprestasi Berbasis Java Desktop Dengan Penggabungan Metode SAW dan Topsis,” J. Apl. Sains, Informasi, Elektron. dan Komput., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 112–122, 2020.
A. A. Fauzi, H. Zulfia Zahro’, and R. Prismaswara Prasetya, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode Topsis Dan Saw Dalam Penentuan Prioritas Perbaikan Jalan Di Kabupaten Rembang,” JATI (Jurnal Mhs. Tek. Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 29–36, 2020, doi: 10.36040/jati.v4i2.2676.
Sunarti, “Perbandingan Metode SAW Dan Topsis Dalam Pemilihan,” Techno.COM, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 76–87, 2019.
A. A. Azhari, Y. Nyura, and A. Najib, “Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS Pada Penerimaan Siswa Praktek Kerja Lapangan,” Semin. Nas. Ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf. 2018, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 71–77, 2018.
W. E. Sari, M. B, and S. Rani, “Perbandingan Metode SAW dan Topsis pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Beasiswa,” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 52–58, 2021, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v10i1.1027.
D. Supiyan, “Perbandingan Metode SAW, WP Dan Topsis Dalam Penentuan Pembiayaan,” J. Ilm. Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 88–94, 2019, doi: 10.35316/jimi.v4i2.544.
I. M. Budiman, N. D. Nathasia, P. Minggu, and J. Selatan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Tata Usaha Biro Administrasi Universitas Nasional Menggunakan Metode Saw Dan Topsis,” J. Ilm. Teknol. dan Rekayasa, vol. 25, no. 2, 2020.
Sunarti, “Perbandingan Metode TOPSIS dan SAW Untuk Pemilihan Rumah Tinggal,” J. Inf. Syst., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 69–79, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://publikasi.dinus.ac.id/index.php/joins/article/view/1883/1289
Fatkhurrochman and D. Astuti, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode Topis Dan Saw Dalam Penentuan Penerima Bantuan Pengembangan Rumah Masyarakat Kurang Mampu,” Semnasteknomedia Online, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 2-8–67, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://ojs.amikom.ac.id/index.php/semnasteknomedia/article/view/1980
M. Akhiroh and F. Nugrahanti, “Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Dana Pinjaman Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” J. Sist. Inf., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 42–44, 2019.
A. Ahmad and Y. I. Kurniawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pegawai Terbaik Menggunakan Simple Additive Weighting Decision Support System For Best Employee Selection Using,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 101–108, 2020.
B. Fredika, A. Santoso, and I. Susilawati, “Decision Support System Of Public Service Satisfaction Using Topsis Method At Regional I Bkn Yogyakarta Menggunakan Metode Topsis Di Kantor Regional I Bkn,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 2021.
E. Yulianti and D. Abrar, “… Pinjaman Dana Di Koperasi Perempuan Pulau Punjung Menggunakan Metode Technique for Order of Preference By Similarity …,” J. TeknoIf, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 89–97, 2019, doi: 10.21063/JTIF.2019.V7.2.
Copyright (c) 2022 Dian Ayu Wigasari, Jati Sasongko Wibowo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
