C4.5 ALGORITHM FOR DISASTER IDENTIFIER SYSTEM

  • Ade Sutedi Institut Teknologi Garut
  • Hilmi Aulawi Institut Teknologi Garut
  • Eko Walujodjati Institut Teknologi Garut
  • Dini Destiani Siti Fatimah Institut Teknologi Garut
Keywords: c4.5 algorithm, disaster management, mapping, n-gram, social media

Abstract

Disaster management is a strategic issue that has been widely studied as a form of mutual responsibility in reducing victims and losses due to disasters. Today, one of the sources of disaster information is spread on Twitter social media. This research explains the implementation of the C4.5 algorithm to classify and map the disaster information that delivers using social media Twitter from the official BNPB_Indonesia account. The disaster data was retrieved and then processed to display in the geographic information system form. The words combination of disaster events, victims, and disaster locations process is carried out using n-gram by divided into unigram, bigram, and trigram to obtain the vocabulary accordance with the database. The C4.5 algorithm in this research was used to classify the disaster information with several categories. The results shows that the C4.5 algorithm can be used to classified the category of disaster and could identified the disaster informasion such as type of disaster, victims, and locations. The result can provide real time information on the distribution of disaster events and their locations using geographical information system. However, for location such as name of provinces only which has many geo-position possibilities (district or sub-district). The determination of the disaster location could be difficult. In addition, to determine the information obtained from post-disaster conditions such as the number of victims, damage, and losses. The comparison of n-gram with predetermined keywords is still constrained by noise of data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. J. J. Beerens, H. Tehler, and B. Pelzer, “How Can We Make Disaster Management Evaluations More Useful? An Empirical Study of Dutch Exercise Evaluations,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 578–591, Oct. 2020.

C. Fan, C. Zhang, A. Yahja, and A. Mostafavi, “Disaster City Digital Twin: A vision for integrating artificial and human intelligence for disaster management,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 56, no. March 2019, p. 102049, Feb. 2021.

P. P. Ray, M. Mukherjee, and L. Shu, “Internet of Things for Disaster Management: State-of-the-Art and Prospects,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, no. i, pp. 18818–18835, 2017.

M. Abdel-basset, R. Mohamed, M. Elhoseny, and V. Chang, “Evaluation framework for smart disaster response systems in uncertainty environment,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 145, p. 106941, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106941.

A. M. A. Saja, A. Goonetilleke, M. Teo, and A. M. Ziyath, “A critical review of social resilience assessment frameworks in disaster management,” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., vol. 35, no. February, p. 101096, Apr. 2019.

Z. Li, Q. Huang, and C. T. Emrich, “Introduction to social sensing and big data computing for disaster management,” Int. J. Digit. Earth, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1198–1204, Nov. 2019.

M. Erdelj, M. Król, and E. Natalizio, “Wireless Sensor Networks and Multi-UAV systems for natural disaster management,” Comput. Networks, vol. 124, pp. 72–86, Sep. 2017.

M. Yu, C. Yang, and Y. Li, “Big Data in Natural Disaster Management: A Review,” Geosciences, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 165, May 2018.

C. Slamet, A. Rahman, A. Sutedi, W. Darmalaksana, M. A. Ramdhani, and D. S. Maylawati, “Social Media-Based Identifier for Natural Disaster,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 288, p. 012039, Jan. 2018.

A. Sutedi, “Rancang Bangun Aplikasi Pengidentifikasi Bencana dan Lokasi Aman Bencana Berbasis Media Sosial,” J. Algoritm., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 239–246, Feb. 2020.

J. P. de Albuquerque, B. Herfort, A. Brenning, and A. Zipf, “A geographic approach for combining social media and authoritative data towards identifying useful information for disaster management,” Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 667–689, 2015.

S. Shan, F. Zhao, Y. Wei, and M. Liu, “Disaster management 2.0: A real-time disaster damage assessment model based on mobile social media data—A case study of Weibo (Chinese Twitter),” Saf. Sci., vol. 115, no. February, pp. 393–413, Jun. 2019.

A. Sutedi, S. Rahayu, R. Elsen, and A. D. Supriatna, “Natural disaster topic selection using decision tree classification,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1402, no. 7, p. 077034, Dec. 2019.

Y. Handrianto and M. Farhan, “C.45 Algorithm for Classification of Causes of Landslides,” SinkrOn, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 120, Oct. 2019.

M. T. Anwar, H. D. Pumomo, S. Y. J. Prasetyo, and K. D. Hartomo, “Decision Tree Learning Approach To Wildfire Modeling on Peat and Non-Peat Land in Riau Province,” in 2018 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), 2018, pp. 409–415.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia, Nomor 24 Tahun 2007, Tentang Penanggulangan Bencana.

D. L. Setyowati, Pendidikan Kebencanaan. 2019.

Sarwidi, “Peran teknik sipil dalam penanggulangan bencana alam,” no. September, pp. 1–18, 2012.

L. Rokach and O. Maimon, Data Mining with Decision Trees Theory and Application, 2nd editio. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 5.

D. Jurafsky and J. H. Martin, Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. 2020.

I. F. Rozi, A. T. Firdausi, and K. Islamiyah, “Analisis Sentimen Pada Twitter Mengenai Pasca Bencana Menggunakan Metode Naïve Bayes Dengan Fitur n-gram,” JIP (Jurnal Inform. Polinema), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 33–39.

“OpenStreetMap.” [Online]. Available: https://www.openstreetmap.org/.

F. Z. Tala, “A Study of Stemming Effects on Information Retrieval in Bahasa Indonesia,” 2003.

Published
2022-06-29
How to Cite
[1]
A. Sutedi, H. Aulawi, E. Walujodjati, and D. D. Siti Fatimah, “C4.5 ALGORITHM FOR DISASTER IDENTIFIER SYSTEM”, J. Tek. Inform. (JUTIF), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 495-500, Jun. 2022.