Improving Brain Tumor Classification In Mri Using Hybrid Mobilenetv2-Densenet121 With Cbam
English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2026.7.4.5669Keywords:
Brain Tumor Classification, MRI, CNN, Deep Learning, Hybrid Model, DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, CBAM, Attention Mechanism, Multi-Class Classification, Cross-Dataset EvaluationAbstract
Brain tumor classification from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images requires robust feature learning because tumor classes show subtle visual differences, especially between glioma and meningioma. This work improves accuracy and stability in multi-class brain tumor classification by enriching features and directing attention to discriminative MRI patterns. A hybrid model uses DenseNet121 and MobileNetV2 as parallel backbones, applies a Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) to each stream, and performs late fusion by concatenating the two feature vectors for final prediction. CBAM improves performance by adaptively reweighting channels that encode tumor-relevant intensity and texture cues while suppressing less informative responses. It also strengthens spatial focus by emphasizing regions aligned with tumor cores and boundaries, reducing interference from normal tissue and artifacts and lowering cross-class confusion. Performance is evaluated with 10-fold cross-validation on the Figshare dataset and a standard hold-out split on the Sartaj Bhuvaji dataset. The proposed model achieves strong results on Figshare (3 classes) with accuracy 0.9892, precision 0.9880, recall 0.9876, F1-score 0.9877, and AUC 0.9995, and it also achieves strong results on Sartaj Bhuvaji (4 classes) with accuracy 0.9816, precision 0.9814, recall 0.9848, F1-score 0.9829, and AUC 0.9984. These results indicate that dual-backbone fusion increases feature diversity and CBAM reduces cross-class confusion, supporting stable generalization across independent MRI datasets. The model improves accuracy in separating visually similar tumors, especially glioma versus meningioma, and maintains strong generalization across different datasets.
Downloads
References
H. Sung et al., “Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries,” CA. Cancer J. Clin., vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209–249, May 2021, doi: 10.3322/caac.21660.
M. G. A. Mittelbronn, “Neurooncology: 2023 update,” Free Neuropathol., p. 4 Seiten, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.17879/FREENEUROPATHOLOGY-2023-4692.
Department of Morpho-Functional Sciences I, Grigore T. Popa University Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania, G.-C. Moroșan, A.-C. Moroșan, Discipline of Psychiatry, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania, C. Ionescu, and Department of Biology, Faculty of Biology, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iasi, Romania, “Neuropsychiatric symptoms as early indicators of brain tumors,” Arch. Clin. Cases, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 120–126, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.22551/2024.45.1104.10302.
E. Scola et al., “Assessment of brain tumors by magnetic resonance dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging and computed tomography perfusion: a comparison study,” Radiol. Med. (Torino), vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 664–672, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11547-022-01470-z.
Q. Han et al., “Glioblastomas with and without peritumoral fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensity present morphological and microstructural differences on conventional MR images,” Eur. Radiol., vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 9139–9151, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09924-2.
R. Goldbrunner et al., “EANO guideline on the diagnosis and management of meningiomas,” Neuro-Oncol., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1821–1834, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab150.
T. Tsukamoto and Y. Miki, “Imaging of pituitary tumors: an update with the 5th WHO Classifications—part 1. Pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET)/pituitary adenoma,” Jpn. J. Radiol., vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 789–806, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01400-7.
M. Afroj, M. R. H. Mondal, M. R. Hassan, and S. Akter, “MobDenseNet: A hybrid deep learning model for brain tumor classification using MRI,” Array, vol. 26, p. 100413, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.array.2025.100413.
T. Loganayagi, M. Sravani, B. Maram, and T. V. M. Rao, “Hybrid Deep Maxout-VGG-16 model for brain tumour detection and classification using MRI images,” J. Biotechnol., vol. 405, pp. 124–138, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2025.05.009.
W. Peng, B. Li, P. Wang, H. Huang, Y. Zou, and X. Qiao, “PVConv: Enhancing Depthwise Separable Convolution via Preference-Value Learning for Similar-Feature Discrimination,” Electronics, vol. 14, no. 24, p. 4978, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.3390/electronics14244978.
S. Hwang, D. Han, and M. Jeon, “Making depthwise convolution SR-friendly via kernel attention injection,” J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent., vol. 96, p. 103930, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2023.103930.
D. Srinivasan and C. Kalaiarasan, “Gradient Propagation Based DenseNet121 with ResNet50 Feature Extraction for Lymphoma Classification,” J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. B, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 1183–1195, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s40031-024-01135-7.
K. S. Lakshmi and B. Sargunam, “Exploration of AI-powered DenseNet121 for effective diabetic retinopathy detection,” Int. Ophthalmol., vol. 44, no. 1, p. 90, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03027-7.
H. Liu, Y. Zhang, and Y. Chen, “A Symmetric Efficient Spatial and Channel Attention (ESCA) Module Based on Convolutional Neural Networks,” Symmetry, vol. 16, no. 8, p. 952, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.3390/sym16080952.
D.-Q. Chen, “Down-scale simplified non-local attention networks with application to image denoising,” Signal Image Video Process., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 47–54, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11760-023-02708-7.
O. O. Oladimeji and A. O. J. Ibitoye, “Brain tumor classification using ResNet50-convolutional block attention module,” Appl. Comput. Inform., Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1108/ACI-09-2023-0022.
N. Sengodan, “Breast Cancer Histopathology Classification using CBAM-EfficientNetV2 with Transfer Learning,” 2024, arXiv. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2410.22392.
E. Prasetyo, R. Purbaningtyas, R. D. Adityo, N. Suciati, and C. Fatichah, “Combining MobileNetV1 and Depthwise Separable convolution bottleneck with Expansion for classifying the freshness of fish eyes,” Inf. Process. Agric., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 485–496, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.inpa.2022.01.002.
S. Woo, J. Park, J.-Y. Lee, and I. S. Kweon, “CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module,” in Computer Vision – ECCV 2018, vol. 11211, V. Ferrari, M. Hebert, C. Sminchisescu, and Y. Weiss, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11211. , Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 3–19. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1.
S. A. Hicks et al., “On evaluation metrics for medical applications of artificial intelligence,” Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 5979, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09954-8.
A. Tharwat, “Classification assessment methods,” Appl. Comput. Inform., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 168–192, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.003.
J. Cheng, “Figshare Brain Tumor Dataset.” Kaggle, Kaggle Datasets, Mar. 23, 2022. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1512427.v8.
S. Bhuvaji, “Brain Tumor Classification (MRI).” Kaggle, Kaggle Datasets, 2025. Accessed: Jan. 26, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/sartajbhuvaji/brain-tumor-classification-mri
D. Rastogi, P. Johri, V. Tiwari, and A. A. Elngar, “Multi-class classification of brain tumour magnetic resonance images using multi-branch network with inception block and five-fold cross validation deep learning framework,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 88, p. 105602, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105602.
M. Nickparvar, “brain-tumor-mri-dataset.” Zenodo, Zenodo Records, Jul. 12, 2024. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12735702.
T. Rahman, M. S. Islam, and J. Uddin, “MRI-Based Brain Tumor Classification Using a Dilated Parallel Deep Convolutional Neural Network,” Digital, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 529–554, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.3390/digital4030027.
S. M. Alqhtani et al., “Improved Brain Tumor Segmentation and Classification in Brain MRI With FCM-SVM: A Diagnostic Approach,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 61312–61335, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3394541.
E. M. Senan, M. E. Jadhav, T. H. Rassem, A. S. Aljaloud, B. A. Mohammed, and Z. G. Al-Mekhlafi, “Early Diagnosis of Brain Tumour MRI Images Using Hybrid Techniques between Deep and Machine Learning,” Comput. Math. Methods Med., vol. 2022, pp. 1–17, May 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/8330833.
M. Rasool et al., “A Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Brain Tumour Classification,” Entropy, vol. 24, no. 6, p. 799, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3390/e24060799.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jamilatul Muyasaroh, Wiharto, Endra Pratama

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

</a



