Title Inclusive Educational Data Mining Framework Using Classification, Clustering, and Association Rules for Parent–Child Interactions and Reflective Learning

Authors

  • Handoko Master of Education, Pradita University, Indonesia
  • Handri Santoso Master of Education, Pradita University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2026.7.4.5656

Keywords:

Educational Data Mining, Family-Centered Learning, Inclusive Education, Reflective Learning, Student Profiling

Abstract

Inclusive education requires integrated academic, social, and emotional support systems to address learner diversity; however, existing Educational Data Mining (EDM) research has largely concentrated on academic or log-based data, with limited attention to family-centered dynamics. This study aims to develop and validate a family-centered EDM framework to examine how the quality of parent–child interactions predicts students’ reflective learning behaviors. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 150 junior and senior high school students from urban Indonesian schools using the Parent–Child Inclusivity Scale (PCIS) and the Self-Assessment Behavior Inventory (SABI). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, reliability testing, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis, followed by EDM techniques including Decision Tree and Naïve Bayes classification, K-Means clustering, and Apriori association rule mining. The classification models achieved accuracies of 82% and 78%, while clustering revealed three distinct inclusivity–reflection profiles. Association rules further identified key combinations of autonomy support, constructive feedback, and joint decision-making that consistently predict high levels of reflective behavior. By explicitly integrating family-centered variables into predictive, profiling, and rule-based EDM analyses, this study advances Informatics by proposing a novel family-centered EDM framework that bridges data analytics with inclusive educational practice and adaptive learning system design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

L. Sebti and B. C. Elder, ‘“Inclusion is definitely a possibility for all”: Promoting inclusive education through a critical professional development schools model’, Sch.-Univ. Partnersh., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 285–302, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1108/SUP-06-2023-0021.

A. C. Rapp and A. Corral-Granados, ‘Understanding inclusive education – a theoretical contribution from system theory and the constructionist perspective’, Int. J. Incl. Educ., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 423–439, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1080/13603116.2021.1946725.

A. R. Sadownik, ‘Bronfenbrenner: Ecology of Human Development in Ecology of Collaboration’, in (Re)theorising More-than-parental Involvement in Early Childhood Education and Care, vol. 40, A. R. Sadownik and A. Višnjić Jevtić, Eds, in International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, vol. 40. , Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 83–95. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-38762-3_4.

L. Bouffard, ‘Ryan, R. M. et Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory. Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. New York, NY : Guilford Press’, Rev. Québécoise Psychol., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 231–234, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.7202/1041847ar.

Y. Wang, H. Wang, S. Wang, S. A. Wind, and C. Gill, ‘A systematic review and meta-analysis of self-determination-theory-based interventions in the education context’, Learn. Motiv., vol. 87, p. 102015, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102015.

W. Kassis, A. Vasiou, C. Govaris, C. Favre, D. Aksoy, and U. Graf, ‘Social and Individual Factors Predicting Students’ Resilience: A Multigroup Structural Equation Model’, Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 15, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci14010015.

W. Chen, Y. Sun, and Y. He, ‘The Relationship between Parental Autonomy Support and Children’s Self-Concept in China—The Role of Basic Psychological Needs’, Behav. Sci., vol. 14, no. 5, p. 415, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/bs14050415.

C. Romero and S. Ventura, ‘Educational Data Mining: A Review of the State of the Art’, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 601–618, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2053532.

R. S. Baker and P. S. Inventado, ‘Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics’, in Learning Analytics, J. A. Larusson and B. White, Eds, New York, NY: Springer New York, 2014, pp. 61–75. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4.

M. M. Hussain, S. Akbar, S. A. Hassan, M. W. Aziz, and F. Urooj, ‘Prediction of Student’s Academic Performance through Data Mining Approach’, J. Inform. Web Eng., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 241–251, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.33093/jiwe.2024.3.1.16.

C. Romero and S. Ventura, ‘Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey’, 2024, doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2402.07956.

E. Kalita et al., ‘Educational data mining: a 10-year review’, Discov. Comput., vol. 28, no. 1, p. 81, May 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10791-025-09589-z.

D. R. Ocy, I. Sarifah, and R. Riyadi, ‘EFA and CFA analysis: Development and validation of a test instrument for mathematical abstraction skills’, JRAMathEdu J. Res. Adv. Math. Educ., Apr. 2025, doi: 10.23917/jramathedu.v10i2.7601.

J. A. Durlak, R. P. Weissberg, A. B. Dymnicki, R. D. Taylor, and K. B. Schellinger, ‘The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions’, Child Dev., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 405–432, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.

E. Panadero, A. Jonsson, and J. Botella, ‘Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses’, Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 22, pp. 74–98, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004.

M. Özgenel and S. Avcı, ‘Parental and Teacher Autonomy Support in Developing Self-Regulation Skills’, Behav. Sci., vol. 15, no. 12, p. 1621, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.3390/bs15121621.

Y. Li, R. Sueb, and K. Said Hashim, ‘The relationship between parental autonomy support, teacher autonomy support, peer support, and university students’ academic engagement: the mediating roles of basic psychological needs and autonomous motivation’, Front. Psychol., vol. 16, p. 1503473, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1503473.

L. Song, Q. Zhan, L. Cao, and R. Luo, ‘Parent autonomy support and undergraduates’ academic engagement in online learning: the mediate role of self-regulation’, Psicol. Reflex. E Crítica, vol. 37, no. 1, p. 45, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41155-024-00330-1.

H. Jang, E. J. Kim, and J. Reeve, ‘Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model’, Learn. Instr., vol. 43, pp. 27–38, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002.

S. A. A. Kharis and A. H. A. Zili, ‘Learning Analytics dan Educational Data Mining pada Data Pendidikan’, J. Ris. PEMBELAJARAN Mat. Sekol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 12–20, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.21009/jrpms.061.02.

G. Lampropoulos and G. Evangelidis, ‘Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining in Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and the Metaverse: A Systematic Literature Review, Content Analysis, and Bibliometric Analysis’, Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no. 2, p. 971, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/app15020971.

M. J. Rotheram-Borus, D. Swendeman, E. Rotheram-Fuller, and M. K. Youssef, ‘Family Coaching as a delivery modality for evidence-based prevention programs’, Clin. Child Psychol. Psychiatry, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 96–109, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1359104517721958.

Y. Akamoglu and L. Dinnebeil, ‘Coaching Parents to Use Naturalistic Language and Communication Strategies’, Young Except. Child., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 41–50, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1096250615598815.

J. Fonseca et al., ‘Changing Teachers’ Feedback Practices: A Workshop Challenge’, Aust. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 40, no. 40, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.14221/ajte.2015v40n8.4.

Rogers Kaliisa, ‘Designing Learning Analytics Tools for Teachers with Teachers A Design-Based Research Study in a Blended Higher Education Context’, 2022, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10558.97605.

A. Olteanu, C. Castillo, F. Diaz, and E. Kıcıman, ‘Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries’, Front. Big Data, vol. 2, p. 13, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.3389/fdata.2019.00013.

C. Maier, J. B. Thatcher, V. Grover, and Y. K. Dwivedi, ‘Cross-sectional research: A critical perspective, use cases, and recommendations for IS research’, Int. J. Inf. Manag., vol. 70, p. 102625, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102625.

Additional Files

Published

2026-08-18

How to Cite

[1]
H. Handoko and H. Santoso, “Title Inclusive Educational Data Mining Framework Using Classification, Clustering, and Association Rules for Parent–Child Interactions and Reflective Learning”, J. Tek. Inform. (JUTIF), vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 3725–3734, Aug. 2026.