Aggregation Model to Determine Criteria Weights for Integrated Primary Health Care Information System (IPCIS) Implementation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2026.7.2.5619Keywords:
Criteria's Weighting, Integrated Primary Care Information System, Posyandu, Rank-Based Aggregation, Score-Based Aggregation, Voting-Based AggregationAbstract
Implementation of the Integrated Primary Health Care Information System (IPCIS) in integrated community health posts (posyandu) is influenced by various factors, including technical aspects, human resources, policies, and data governance. Given the diverse field conditions, the impact of each factor can vary, so it is important to understand the relative importance of each criterion. This study aims to determine the weight of the criteria that influence the implementation of IPCIS in posyandu. Ten people answered the questions correctly (out of 22 respondents), including cadres, sub-district staff, and health workers from Tirtorahayu Village. Respondent preferences were collected using three approaches: rank-based aggregation (Borda, Condorcet, Copeland), score-based aggregation (average), and voting-based aggregation (plurality and majority) to obtain the criteria weights (w) and a comparative analysis between the approaches. The findings demonstrate that the IPCIS criteria for security and protection of personal data were consistently given the highest weights. In the ranking-based aggregation approaches (w_Borda=0.11, w_Condorcet=0.20, w_Copeland=0.19). In score-based aggregation approaches (w=0.11). In voting-based aggregation approaches (w=0.15). It is indicating a strong group consensus regarding the importance of these aspects in IPCIS implementation. The combination of ranking-based and score-based aggregation resulted in stable IPCIS implementation criterion weights that reflected group consensus, with voting-based aggregation acting as validation. The practical implication is that the obtained weighted criteria can be used as a basis for determining program priorities and resource allocation when implementing IPCIS.
Downloads
References
N. M. Capeletti, C. A. F. Amado, and S. P. Santos, “Performance assessment of primary health care services using data envelopment analysis and the quality-adjusted malmquist index,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 361–377, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1080/01605682.2023.2197928.
J. C. Alegre, S. Sharma, F. Cleghorn, and C. Avila, “Strengthening primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: furthering structural changes in the post-pandemic era,” Front. Public Health, vol. 11, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1270510.
J. Roberti, A. Mazzoni, M. Guglielmino, A. Falaschi, Y. Mazzaresi, and E. Garcia Elorrio, “Recommendations for strengthening primary healthcare delivery models for chronic disease management in Mendoza: a RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panel,” BMJ Open, vol. 15, no. 4, p. e098074, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098074.
J. G.-T. You, T. I. Leung, D. Pandita, and M. Sakumoto, “Primary Care Informatics: Vitalizing the Bedrock of Health Care,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 26, p. e60081, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.2196/60081.
A. Epizitone, S. P. Moyane, and I. E. Agbehadji, “A Systematic Literature Review of Health Information Systems for Healthcare,” Healthcare, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 959, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/healthcare11070959.
D. N. Aisyah, A. H. Setiawan, C. A. Mayadewi, A. F. Lokopessy, Z. Kozlakidis, and L. Manikam, “Understanding Health Information Systems Utilization Across Public Health Centers in Indonesia: Cross-Sectional Study,” JMIR Med. Inform., vol. 13, pp. e68613–e68613, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.2196/68613.
Í. de S. Silva et al., “Digital health and quality of care in Primary Health Care: an evaluation model,” Front. Public Health, vol. 12, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1443862.
C. T. Blondino, A. Knoepflmacher, I. Johnson, C. Fox, and L. Friedman, “The use and potential impact of digital health tools at the community level: results from a multi-country survey of community health workers,” BMC Public Health, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 650, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18062-3.
L. Porterfield, V. Warren, V. Schick, S. Gulliot-Wright, J. R. Temple, and E. M. Vaughan, “Addressing Training Gaps: A Competency-Based, Telehealth Training Initiative for Community Health Workers,” Telemed. Rep., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 126–134, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0007.
S. Ramachandran et al., “Digital Competencies and Training Approaches to Enhance the Capacity of Practitioners to Support the Digital Transformation of Public Health: Rapid Review of Current Recommendations,” JMIR Public Health Surveill., vol. 10, pp. e52798–e52798, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.2196/52798.
J. Bell, L. M. Gottlieb, C. R. Lyles, O. K. Nguyen, S. L. Ackerman, and E. H. De Marchis, “Provision of digital devices and internet connectivity to improve synchronous telemedicine access in the U.S.: a systematic scoping review,” Front. Digit. Health, vol. 6, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1408170.
I. J. Borges do Nascimento et al., “Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals,” NPJ Digit. Med., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 161, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00899-4.
L. Woods, P. Martin, J. Khor, L. Guthrie, and C. Sullivan, “The right care in the right place: a scoping review of digital health education and training for rural healthcare workers,” BMC Health Serv. Res., vol. 24, no. 1, p. 1011, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11313-4.
Y. Wang et al., “Factors Associated With Digital Capacity for Health Promotion Among Primary Care Workers: Cross-Sectional Survey Study,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 26, p. e63054, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.2196/63054.
T. Mutemaringa, A. Boulle, and N. Tiffin, “Data governance for ethical usage of linked routine health data in South Africa: balancing privacy and data sharing.,” Int. J. Popul. Data Sci., vol. 9, no. 5, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v9i5.2721.
T. K. Colicchio, G. Del Fiol, and J. J. Cimino, “Health information technology as a learning health system: Call for a national monitoring system,” Learn. Health Syst., vol. 4, no. 1, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10207.
F. A. C. J. Heijsters et al., “A usability evaluation of the perceived user friendliness, accessibility, and inclusiveness of a personalized digital care pathway tool,” Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 175, p. 105070, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105070.
S. Rosman, N. Z. Siau, and A. Bramantoro, “Evaluating User Interface and User Experience in Mobile Applications Designed for the Elderly,” in 2023 6th International Conference on Applied Computational Intelligence in Information Systems (ACIIS), IEEE, Oct. 2023, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ACIIS59385.2023.10367221.
C. Anders et al., “Usability and User Experience of an mHealth App for Therapy Support of Patients With Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study Using Eye Tracking,” JMIR Hum. Factors, vol. 11, p. e50926, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.2196/50926.
B. Alhmoud, D. Melley, N. Khan, T. Bonicci, R. Patel, and A. Banerjee, “Evaluating a novel, integrative dashboard for health professionals’ performance in managing deteriorating patients: a quality improvement project,” BMJ Open Qual., vol. 11, no. 4, p. e002033, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002033.
A. J. Holmgren, M. Esdar, J. Hüsers, and J. Coutinho-Almeida, “Health Information Exchange: Understanding the Policy Landscape and Future of Data Interoperability,” Yearb. Med. Inform., vol. 32, no. 01, pp. 184–194, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768719.
M. Kar and S. Ram, “Digital governance in transforming health systems and health policy in India,” The Journal of Community Health Management, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 6–12, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.18231/j.jchm.2024.003.
L. Li et al., “Balancing Risks and Opportunities: Data-Empowered-Health Ecosystems,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 27, p. e57237, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.2196/57237.
R. Ambalavanan, R. S. Snead, J. Marczika, G. Towett, A. Malioukis, and M. Mbogori-Kairichi, “Challenges and strategies in building a foundational digital health data integration ecosystem: a systematic review and thematic synthesis,” Frontiers in Health Services, vol. 5, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1600689.
P. Shojaei, E. Vlahu-Gjorgievska, and Y.-W. Chow, “Security and Privacy of Technologies in Health Information Systems: A Systematic Literature Review,” Computers, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 41, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/computers13020041.
A. Rai, R. B. Khatri, and Y. Assefa, “Primary Health Care Systems and Their Contribution to Universal Health Coverage and Improved Health Status in Seven Countries: An Explanatory Mixed-Methods Review,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 21, no. 12, p. 1601, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121601.
C. Hardiyanti, S. Hardiyanti, and R. Kurniawan, “Evaluation of Success and Failure Factors for Maternal and Child Health in Integrated Healthcare Center Information Systems (IHCIS) Using the HOT-Fit Method,” Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 152–166, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.20473/jisebi.10.1.152-166.
S. Kusumadewi, R. Kurniawan, E. G. Wahyuni, A. Arifin, and L. Rosita, “Identification of factors in the implementation of the primary health care service integration system to support disaster risk management,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 651, p. 02004, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202565102004.
H. Liao, X. Wu, X. Mi, and F. Herrera, “An integrated method for cognitive complex multiple experts multiple criteria decision making based on ELECTRE III with weighted Borda rule,” Omega (Westport)., vol. 93, p. 102052, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2019.03.010.
C. Leedham-Green, K. Markström, and S. Riis, “The largest Condorcet domain on 8 alternatives,” Soc. Choice Welfare, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 109–116, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s00355-023-01481-3.
A. Villar, “Old rockers: Borda and Condorcet revisited,” Economic Theory Bulletin, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 45–53, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s40505-024-00279-5.
A. Özaşkın and A. Görener, “An integrated multi-criteria decision-making approach for overcoming barriers to green supply chain management and prioritizing alternative solutions,” Supply Chain Analytics, vol. 3, p. 100027, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.sca.2023.100027.
S. Wang, Q. Deng, S. Feng, H. Zhang, and C. Liang, “A Survey on Rank Aggregation,” in Proceedings of the Thirty-ThirdInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, Aug. 2024, pp. 8281–8289. doi: 10.24963/ijcai.2024/915.
N. Boehmer, R. Bredereck, and D. Peters, “Rank Aggregation Using Scoring Rules,” Computer Science and Game Theory, Sep. 2022.
D. Chen, Y. Xiao, J. Wu, I. J. Pérez, and E. Herrera-Viedma, “A robust rank aggregation framework for collusive disturbance based on community detection,” Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 62, no. 4, p. 104096, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104096.
M. Franklin, R. M. Hunter, A. Enrique, J. Palacios, and D. Richards, “Estimating Cost-Effectiveness Using Alternative Preference-Based Scores and Within-Trial Methods: Exploring the Dynamics of the Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Using the EQ-5D 5-Level Version and Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index,” Value in Health, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1018–1029, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1358.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sri Kusumadewi, Rahadian Kurniawan, Elyza Gustri Wahyuni, Aridhanyati Arifin, Linda Rosita, Mutmainna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
