Analysis and Comparative Prediction of Daily ET₀ Using FAO Penman-Monteith Integrated with LSTM and BiLSTM Models in Pinrang Regency

Authors

  • Hanum Zalsabilah Idham Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Makassar, Indonesia
  • Firji Achmad Fahresi Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Makassar, Indonesia
  • Firdaus Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Makassar, Indonesia
  • Andi Akram Nur Risal Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Makassar, Indonesia
  • Dewi Fatmarani Surianto Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jutif.2026.7.4.5602

Keywords:

Agricultural Informatics, Bidirectional LSTM, FAO Penman-Monteith, Irrigation Planning, Reference Evapotranspiration, Time-series Prediction

Abstract

Accurate and adaptive irrigation water management is essential for maintaining rice productivity in regions with high climatic variability, such as Pinrang Regency, Indonesia. Conventional irrigation practices based on fixed schedules often fail to respond daily weather dynamics, resulting in inefficient water use. This study analyzes reference evapotranspiration (ET₀) as a climate-based indicator of irrigation water requirements and predicts daily ET₀ values using deep learning approaches. ET₀ was calculated using the FAO Penman-Monteith method based on daily meteorological variables, including air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, surface pressure, and solar radiation. Daily climate data for the 2018-2024 period were obtained from the NASA POWER database, comprising 2,892 observations, and processed using Min-Max normalization, a 30-day sliding window scheme, and chronological data partitioning. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM) models were trained using the Adam optimizer to perform daily ET₀ prediction. The results show that ET₀ exhibits a distinct seasonal pattern, with higher values during the late dry season and lower values in the rainy season. Model evaluation indicates that BiLSTM slightly outperforms the LSTM model, achieving an MAE of 0.4185 mm/day, an RMSE of 0.5369 mm/day, and a MAPE of 10.42%, compared to the LSTM model with an MAE of 0.4205 mm/day, an RMSE of 0.5389 mm/day, and a MAPE of 10.44%. Medium-term ET₀ projections for the 2025-2027 period demonstrate consistent seasonal patterns relevant for irrigation planning. This study contributes to informatics by providing a reproducible deep learning-based time-series prediction framework to support adaptive irrigation management and sustainable agriculture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Zhu, W. Tong, H. Li, K. Li, W. Xu, and B. Liang, “Temporal Variations in Rice Water Requirements and the Impact of Effective Rainfall on Irrigation Demand: Strategies for Sustainable Rice Cultivation,” Water, vol. 17, no. 5, p. 656, 2025, doi: 10.3390/w17050656.

A. Hasibuan, S. P. Nasution, F. A. Yani, H. A. Hasibuan, and N. Firzah, “Strategi Peningkatan Usaha Tani Padi Sawah Untuk Meningkatkan Perekonomian Masyarakat Desa,” ABDIKAN J. Pengabdi. Masy. Bid. Sains dan Teknol., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 477–490, 2022, doi: 10.55123/abdikan.v1i4.1095.

A. Ali, A. Sulfanita, A. Bustan, and Adnan, “Perhitungan Nilai Efisiensi Saluran Di Daerah Irigasi Saddang UPT Tiroang Kabupaten Pinrang,” Innov. J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 15266–15273, 2024, doi: 10.31004/innovative.v4i4.14923.

L. Ilham, A. Sulfanita, A. B. Didi, and A. Adnan, “Analisa Debit Aliran Irigasi Saluran Induk Sawitto Terhadap Kebutuhan Air Sawah Di Kabupaten Pinrang,” JURRITEK J. Ris. Rumpun Ilmu Tek., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 159–169, 2024, doi: 10.55606/jurritek.v3i1.2824.

B. Kelley, Y. Dong, M. I. Chilvers, and N. Das, “Understanding the impact of irrigation scheduling on water use ef fi ciency in corn and soybean production in humid climates : insights from on-farm demonstration,” Front. Agron., vol. 7, p. 1496198, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fagro.2025.1496198.

A. B. Ahady, E. Klopries, H. Schüttrumpf, and S. Wolf, “Drought Analysis Methods : A Multidisciplinary Review with Insights on Key Decision-Making Factors in Method Selection,” water, vol. 17, no. 15, p. 2248, 2025, doi: 10.3390/w17152248.

E. Marsoro, Luas Panen dan Produksi Padi di Indonesia ( Hasil KSA Amatan Oktober 2025 ), no. 112. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), 2025.

L. R. E. Malau, K. R. Rambe, N. A. Ulya, and A. G. Purba, “Dampak Perubahan Iklim Terhadap Produksi Tanaman Pangan Di Indonesia,” J. Penelit. Pertan. Terap., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 34–46, 2023, doi: 10.25181/jppt.v23i1.2418.

A. I. Widiawati, N. V. A. Harini, D. M. I. Irpawa, N. R. Anggraini, and N. Hidayat, “Dampak Anomali Iklim Terhadap Produksi Padi di Kecamatan Seputih Mataram Kabupaten Lampung Tengah,” J. Agric. Anim. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 79–88, 2025, doi: 10.47637/agrimals.v5i1.1734.

F. Rozci, “Dampak Perubahan Iklim Terhadap Sektor Pertanian Padi The Impact of Climate Change on The Rice Agriculture Sector,” J. Ilm. Sosio Agribis, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 108–116, 2024, doi: 10.30742/jisa23220233476.

Y. Hou, S. Wang, S. Song, P. Chen, and X. Wu, “Crop irrigation water requirements mismatch the actual water allocation in the anthropogenic-regulated Yellow River Basin,” J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud., vol. 61, no. 19, p. 102715, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102715.

Sudirwo, A. Hadi, L. Judijanto, N. Purwandari, N. N. L. E. Zain, and K. H. Rambe, Artificial Intelligence. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2025.

M. Waqas, U. W. Humphries, B. Chueasa, and A. Wangwongchai, “Artificial intelligence and numerical weather prediction models: A technical survey,” Nat. Hazards Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 306–320, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.nhres.2024.11.004.

L. Anggraini, Maharani, M. L. Zahara, H. Sonadinata, S. Z. Zulfari, and Y. Budiawati, “Literature Review: Analisis Implementasi IOT pada Sistem Irigasi Cerdas untuk Efisiensi Penggunaan Air,” Integr. Perspect. Soc. Sci. J., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 3601–3611, 2025.

X. Zhao et al., “Analysis of irrigation demands of rice : Irrigation decision-making needs to consider future rainfall,” Agric. Water Manag., vol. 280, p. 108196, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108196.

A. Mastam, S. Suhardi, and S. N. Faridah, “Analysis of Potential Water Availability for Irrigation Needs at Lekopancing Dam , Maros Regency,” BIO Web Conf., vol. 96, p. 04005, 2024, doi: 10.1051/bioconf/20249604005.

S. Lipu, R. Vargorio, and O. D. Retno, “Analysis of water availability of the Singkoyo River for the irrigation needs in the Banggai Regency , Indonesian,” Electrochem. Soc., vol. 930, no. 1, p. 012046, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/930/1/012046.

H. Nassah, A. Zitouni, O. Tibssirte, L. Daghor, H. Chattoui, and L. Midhat, “Irrigation water needs analysis and management strategies in the Tadla irrigation zone : A case study of sugar beet plots,” Ecol. Eng. Environ. Technol., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 50–58, 2025, doi: 10.12912/27197050/200563.

A. Abdulrahim, M. D. Shehu, E. Yisa, and Z. A. Ishaq, “Mathematical Models and Comparative Analysis for Rice and Soya Bean Irrigation Crop Water Needs: A Case Study of Bida Basin Niger State, Nigeria,” J. Niger. Soc. Phys. Sci., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 354–359, 2021, doi: 10.46481/jnsps.2021.149.

D. I. Kusumastuti, D. Jokowinarno, R. Putri1, and L. Khadijah, “The needs and availability analysis of irrigation water of Way Wayah Irrigation Area,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. Pap., vol. 739, no. 1, p. 012028, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/739/1/012028.

N. Zrira, A. Kamal-idrissi, R. Farssi, and H. A. Khan, “Time series prediction of sea surface temperature based on BiLSTM model with attention mechanism,” J. Sea Res., vol. 198, p. 102472, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2024.102472.

S. Wei and T. Xu, “An LSTM approach to deciphering irrigation operations from remote sensing and groundwater levels records,” Agric. Water Manag., vol. 308, p. 109273, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109273.

J. Siswanto, Hendry, U. Rahardja, I. Sembiring, and E. A. Lisangan, “Predicting Transjakarta Passengers with LSTM-BiLSTM Deep Learning Models for Smart Transportpreneurship,” APTISI Trans. Technopreneursh., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 84–96, 2025, doi: 10.34306/att.v7i1.440.

T. Handhayani, I. Lewenusa, D. E. Herwindiati, and J. Hendryli, “A Comparison of LSTM and BiLSTM for Forecasting the Air Pollution Index and Meteorological Conditions in Jakarta,” 2022 5th Int. Semin. Res. Inf. Technol. Intell. Syst., no. 1, pp. 334–339, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ISRITI56927.2022.10053078.

I. M. Nizar, D. Adytia, and A. W. Ramadhan, “Forecasting of Temperature by using LSTM and Bidirectional LSTM approach : Case Study in Semarang , Indonesia,” 2021 Int. Conf. Data Sci. Its Appl., pp. 146–150, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICoDSA53588.2021.9617495.

I. Ghiat, H. R. Mackey, and T. Al-ansari, “A Review of Evapotranspiration Measurement Models, Techniques and Methods for Open and Closed Agricultural Field Applications,” water, vol. 13, no. 18, p. 2523, 2021, doi: 10.3390/w13182523.

H. D. Abeysiriwardana, N. Muttil, and U. Rathnayake, “A Comparative Study of Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation by Three Methods with FAO Penman-Monteith Method across Sri Lanka,” hydrology, vol. 9, no. 11, p. 206, 2022, doi: 10.3390/hydrology9110206.

L. Fang and D. Shao, “Application of Long Short-Term Memory ( LSTM ) on the Prediction of Rainfall-Runoff in Karst Area,” Front. Phys., vol. 9, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fphy.2021.790687.

M. Yang and J. Wang, “Adaptability of Financial Time Series Based on BiLSTM,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 199, pp. 18–25, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.003.

K. Nifa, A. Boudhar, H. Ouatiki, H. Elyoussfi, B. Bargam, and A. Chehbouni, “Deep Learning Approach with LSTM for Daily Streamflow Prediction in a Semi-Arid Area : A Case Study of Oum Er-Rbia,” water, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 262, 2023, doi: 10.3390/w15020262.

H. Apaydin, M. T. Sattari, K. Falsafian, and R. Prasad, “Artificial intelligence modelling integrated with Singular Spectral analysis and Seasonal-Trend decomposition using Loess approaches for streamflow predictions,” J. Hydrol., vol. 600, p. 126506, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126506.

G. Mao et al., “Comprehensive comparison of artificial neural networks and long short-term memory networks for rainfall-runoff simulation,” Phys. Chem. Earth, vol. 123, p. 103026, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2021.103026.

H. Yan, F. Xie, D. Long, Y. Long, P. Yu, and H. Chen, “An accurate irrigation volume prediction method based on an optimized LSTM model,” PeerJ Comput. Sci., vol. 10, p. 2112, 2024, doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2112.

U. G. Joy, S. Kabir, A. F. M. Farhad, and A. Islam, “An adaptive multi-scale attention-based framework for robust energy and resource forecasting across heterogeneous datasets,” e-Prime - Adv. Electr. Eng. Electron. Energy, vol. 13, p. 101070, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.prime.2025.101070.

D. I. Puteri, “Implementasi Long Short Term Memory ( LSTM ) dan Bidirectional Long Short Term Memory ( BiLSTM ) Dalam Prediksi Harga Saham Syariah,” EULER J. Ilm. Mat. Sains dan Teknol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2023, doi: 10.34312/euler.v11i1.19791.

M. Waqas and S. M. Kim, “Hybrid Deep Learning Versus Empirical Methods for Daily Potential Evapotranspiration Estimation in the Nakdong River Basin, South Korea,” Water, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 32, 2025, doi: 10.3390/w18010032.

H. Mukhtar, R. Gunawan, A. Hariyanto, Syahril, and W. Mulyana, “Peramalan Kedatangan Wisatawan ke Suatu Negara Menggunakan Metode Support Vector,” J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 274–282, 2022, doi: 10.37859/coscitech.v3i3.4211.

H. Khoshvaght, R. Ramyad, A. Razmjou, and M. Khiadani, “A critical review on selecting performance evaluation metrics for supervised machine learning models in wastewater quality prediction,” J. Environ. Chem. Eng., vol. 13, no. 6, p. 119675, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2025.119675.

Additional Files

Published

2026-08-14

How to Cite

[1]
H. Z. Idham, F. A. Fahresi, F. Firdaus, A. A. N. Risal, and D. F. Surianto, “Analysis and Comparative Prediction of Daily ET₀ Using FAO Penman-Monteith Integrated with LSTM and BiLSTM Models in Pinrang Regency”, J. Tek. Inform. (JUTIF), vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 3225–3245, Aug. 2026.

Most read articles by the same author(s)